Conclusion

When assessing any kind of product, the first task is to determine the targeted audience. In the case of the CS -M series, it is obvious that Corsair is targeting those who are willing to pay a little extra over the cheapest solution possible for a good PSU, yet they still pursue the best bang for their buck. The 450W version that we reviewed today has an output ideal for typical home and office PCs, including medium power gaming systems with a single GPU, which covers a very large portion of the market. The retail price of $80 however is pushing the boundaries of cost effectiveness, as significantly more powerful PSUs can be bought for this kind of money.

Overall, Corsair managed to surprise us positively with both the performance and the quality of the CS450M. We did not expect a record-breaking product for that price, but the CS450M performed better than we anticipated. Due to the low power output and very good efficiency of the PSU, the losses are minimal and the necessity for cooling is relatively low. As such, the CS450M can function almost noiselessly under normal operating conditions. The power quality is good as well, as the CS450M suppresses the maximum voltage ripple on all lines at about 60% of the design limit when operating inside a hotbox and presents good voltage regulation figures. Indubitably, these performance figures are inferior to those we are used to seeing from top-tier units lately, yet the CS450M is not a product designed to compete against those in terms of raw performance.

However, what is even more surprising than the performance of the CS450M is the quality. When checking products of this range, we expect to find components coming from "low cost" (or even unknown) manufacturers. Instead, we found components inside the CS450M typically reserved for higher tier products. For example, all of the electrolytic capacitors that are critical for the long-term reliability of the PSU come from very reputable Japanese manufacturers. Even those of secondary importance are supplied by known manufacturers and are rated for operation at 105°C, a figure that it is next to impossible to be reached inside a 450W unit as efficient as this one. Great Wall did an excellent job making this PSU. It is not by chance that Corsair backs the CS450M with a three-year warranty.

There is only one issue regarding the CS450M. It has only a single 6+2 pin PCI Express connector, meaning that it cannot power many high-performance graphics cards currently available, generally topping out at GeForce GTX 960 or Radeon R9 270. In terms of power output, the CS450M should be able to cope with almost any single GPU card, as long as it is paired with a reasonable CPU and there is no serious overclocking/tweaking taking place. For example, a system with a typical four core CPU and a single GeForce GTX980/Radeon R9 280X GPU could be powered by the CS450M without issues. If someone however tries to power a system with the exotic AMD FX-9590 and a Radeon R9 295X2 with the CS450M, that would certainly not end well. Therefore, to reduce the risk of people making "unwise" hardware combinations despite the hardware specifications, Corsair decided not to provide two PCI Express connectors.

This move however will have everyone who wants to build a standard gaming PC, with just a single good CPU and GPU installed, thinking twice before buying a CS450M. This is especially true if someone is on a tight budget and is looking for used cards, as previous generation high performance models generally use two PCI Express connectors. This despite the fact that the power consumption of such a system with a single GPU should be below 400 Watts, well within the capacity of the CS450M.

With all of that said, there are solutions to the CS450M's limitations. 150-225W cards are increasingly using a single 8-pin connector instead of two 6-pin connectors (e.g. GeForce GTX 960/970). So this is likely a bigger problem in the present than the future, as the CS450M is able to drive those newer 8-pin designs. Meanwhile, adapters can be had to convert a couple of Molex connectors to a PCI Express connector for only a few dollars, with several manufacturers throwing in those adapters with their mid-range cards. Alternatively, one can split off the single 6+2 pin connector, though these are potentially risky as the current can surpass the threshold of a single PCI Express connector if used to drive a card designed for over 225W. In either case it is not impossible to build a very good gaming system powered by the CS450M, yet it pushes the user to either select a proper mid-range card or use an adaptor at the expense of two Molex connectors. 

In summary, the Corsair CS450M is a very well made, reliable PSU that offers good overall performance, though without fancy bells and whistles. It has been designed to compete by offering high quality and good performance at a sensible price. However, the simple lack of two PCI Express connectors reduces the potential market of the CS450M, and requires owners of higher power graphics cards to either look into more specialized video cards, or pay a bit more for an adapter. Otherwise, for the out of the box experience, paying $80 for a PSU to power a sub-300 Watts PC is not a very cost-effective solution and is likely to drive the consumers towards lower cost models.

Meanwhile, the retail price of the CS450M is rather volatile, with the unit being on sale twice in the past couple of weeks alone and the retail price going as low as $57 including shipping. For such a price, the CS450M is a steal for users that want to power a home/office PC or do not mind the use of an adapter to power a performance graphics card. At its current retail price however, $80 is not the kind of fantastic deal that would make us to straightforwardly recommend purchasing the CS450M without some consideration.

Hot Test Results
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • Black Obsidian - Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - link

    I've used a number of CS450M and CS550M PSUs for budget builds, since they can both regularly be found <$50 (and sometimes <$40, in the case of the reviewed model).

    I've been relying on the Corsair name and warranty as a proxy for actual PSU quality, and I'm quite happy to hear that the quality I'd been assuming actually exists.

    Thanks for prodding manufacturers to provide reasonable-wattage PSUs for review, Fyll!
  • Computer Bottleneck - Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - link

    It actually drops to $26.99 after rebate on a fairly regular basis at Newegg.
  • MapRef41N93W - Thursday, June 11, 2015 - link

    You've been relying on the wrong company then as Corsair are known to release lots of dodgy PSU's in the past. Their "I" series PSUs are hot garbage and usually a complete waste of money compared to the standard series. Their RM series beyond 550 watts suffers from horrible ripple voltage issues. Their CX series (one of the most popular PSU lines due to their extremely cheap price) are not something that should ever be paired with a "high end" setup (like a 4790k/GTX 980) and yet we see this all the time.

    Never trust a single brand of PSUs and always check the OEM of the unit you are buying first. The only real exception to this is Seasonic as they make most of their own PSUs.
  • Zap - Thursday, June 11, 2015 - link

    What is this "horrible ripple" that you speak of? Does it not stay within ATX specifications and manufacturer claims? Or does it just not measure up to "enthusiast" expectations?

    I did a quick search and found "Why you might not want to buy a Corsair RM PSU" on overclock.net which referenced a TechPowerUp review of the RM1000 as showing the worst performance. The review mentioned a few places where it "failed" such as exceeding ATX specifications for 3.3v ripple at 110% output and OTP triggered at 45°C. Note that both failures exceeds specifications (Corsair rates this PSU to only 40°C).

    The only real fail is in hold-up time, which failed to meet ATX specifications. This would be a good reason to not get this particular PSU, especially if power in your area fluctuates more than normal.

    These PSUs are a far cry from the true "crap" units. Diablotek anyone? Deer? Apevia?
  • Flunk - Thursday, June 11, 2015 - link

    Diablotek units are just as likely to destroy your entire system as work properly so that's not a very good comparison. The previous poster has a point that Corsair's power supplies have a checkered history with certain series (like the CX) being notoriously poor. Maybe this new CS series is them trying to improve their low end offerings, but because Corsair sources power supplies from many, many companies you have to be careful buying from them. Some of their power supplies are great, some are not so great. It's not like Seasonic where they build all their own power supplies.
  • Zap - Friday, June 12, 2015 - link

    My point was that there is a difference between "will destroy your computer" and "horrible ripple but still in spec."
  • PICman - Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - link

    Your reviews are excellent, thanks! For the power efficiency tests, was your mains voltage 220V? Maybe it is listed, but I missed it.
  • Wwhat - Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - link

    There is a link to 'how do we test', on that link page it says:
    "We should note that all testing is being performed with a 230V/50Hz input, delivered by a 3000VA VARIAC for the perfect adjustment of the input voltage. "

    Incidentally 230V is the EU standard.
  • ATC9001 - Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - link

    I understand that high end (i.e. reliable and consistent) equipment for electronics can be expensive, but PLEASE try to convince anandtech to foot the bill so we can get 120V and 230V!

    Great review though, thank you!
  • leexgx - Saturday, June 13, 2015 - link

    230v is optimal for PSUs , where as USA it can be as low as 90V or as high as 120V (why HardOCP tests there PSUs at low voltage as well)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now