Conclusions

The ASUS ROG Swift PG278Q is a monitor that is good when it comes to the usability features, but falls short on many of the objective measures. With a well designed stand, a pair of USB 3.0 ports, and a nice OSD, it is a display that is easy to use and adjust. It has a TN panel, but it is easy to make sure it is in line with your eyes and won't suffer as much color shifting and other issues that TN often can.

However, it doesn't have any side USB ports, only a single DisplayPort 1.2 input, and the uniformity of the display leaves a lot to be desired. The pre-calibrations numbers are decent though not exceptional, but the uniformity data isn't good. There are issues at the top and lower-right of the display that cause the backlight uniformity to be bad and the color uniformity to suffer as a result.

Of course most people are buying a G-SYNC display for gaming, not image editing, and here the ROG does well. Compared to the previously reviewed Acer 4K G-SYNC, the ASUS is superior for gaming. The extra resolution of the Acer may work better for movies or daily work, but for gaming the ASUS does a better job today. The main drawback of the ASUS is the use of a TN panel over IPS, though Acer has shown a 144Hz IPS G-SYNC display they plan to release. Since IPS has more image retention than TN we aren't sure how this will perform in real life, but it might be an answer for gaming and daily use.

For the gamers ASUS is targeting with this display, the ROG Swift PG278Q is a very good choice. The resolution is more appropriate for gaming than a 4K display, and the objective measurements are better as well. ASUS could add some additional USB 3.0 ports but that isn't a major loss. Overall the ROG is a very good monitor for the target audience.

If there's one major concern, it's pricing. There are plenty of 27" 2560x1440 IPS displays available with prices starting well under $500, and with many of those you can even overclock the signal to varying degrees (so 80-90 Hz is often achievable). You don't get G-SYNC or any other form of adaptive V-SYNC, but you do often get better image quality. With a current price of $790 online, the PG278Q is roughly twice the cost, making it very much a premium gaming accessory for NVIDIA GPU owners. It's expensive, yes, but then unlike a high-end GPU there's a good chance you'll still be able to happily use this display five years down the road.

Power Use, Gamut, Input Lag
Comments Locked

101 Comments

View All Comments

  • RandomUser13 - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    Friday the 13th and this is the first comment, great!
    Great review by the way.
  • TerdFerguson - Sunday, February 15, 2015 - link

    C'mon, the review started with "The ASUS Republic of Gamers (ROG) line includes everything you want for building a high-end gaming." How can anyone trust a review that contains drivel worse than a press release?
  • Jaaap - Sunday, February 15, 2015 - link

    Yes. For building *a* high-end gaming PC.
    Not for building the best or the cheapest or whatever.
    It's a statement about the completeness of the line-up.
  • Antronman - Sunday, February 15, 2015 - link

    Because it's true since it's ASUS' top-end product line?
  • Anon Zero - Friday, November 27, 2015 - link

    And the winner for "Most Asinine Comment IS...(drumroll)
  • QuantumPion - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    I tried buying an ROG Swift and really liked the panel's speed, color, and g-sync. However I went through 4 monitors, all defective, before finally giving up. One monitor was utterly damaged (cracked LCD panel). The other 3 had extremely bad color calibration with gamma as low as 1.6, making everything extremely washed out and looking worse than a low end budget LCD from 2005. The gamma was so far off that attempting to calibrate it caused terrible color banding and white/black crushing.
  • Inglix - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    It took me four months and 5 monitors to get a non-defective one.

    I've since had a nightmare where it fails with red lines down the middle. Asus RMA support reportedly ships them back in a back in a normal cardboard box with one piece of crushed paper to protect it.
  • cknobman - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    Pay the Nvidia tax, lol

    No thanks G-SYNC is not worth an extra $400 for a crappy TN panel.
  • PlugPulled - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    i got to agree with you. But its the best TN panel out there for 144hz with 3d vision and Gsync. Can't get lower response time on IPS.
  • yefi - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    No longer the case. Acer XB270HU - 144Hz IPS.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now