Final Words

My thoughts about the M600 are mixed. On the one hand I am happy to see that Micron is showing its commitment to the client market by investing on features like Dynamic Write Acceleration because to be honest, Micron has not really introduced anything new to its client SSDs since the M500. Innovation in the client segment is difficult because the market is so cost driven and even though a pseudo-SLC cache is nothing new, Micron's way of implementing it is.

On the other hand, I am a bit disappointed by the performance of the M600 and especially Dynamic Write Acceleration. In theory Dynamic Write Acceleration sounds great because it should provide the maximum acceleration capacity under every circumstance and thus maximize performance, but the truth is that the speed improvements over the MX100 are minimal. Add to that the fact that the M600 is actually outperformed by the 840 EVO, which utilizes TLC NAND with smaller SLC caches. It is not like the M600 is a slow or bad drive, not at all; it is just that I expected a bit more given the combination of MLC NAND and dynamic SLC cache.

The positive side of Dynamic Write Acceleration is the increased endurance. While 72TB was without a doubt enough for average client workloads, it is never a bad thing to have more. Especially OEMs tend to appreciate higher endurance because it is associated with higher reliability, and it also opens a wider market for the M600 as it can be used in workstation setups without having to worry about drives wearing out. Of course, I would pick a faster drive like 850 Pro for workstation use, but for OEMs the cost tends to be more important.

NewEgg Price Comparison (9/28/2014)
  120/128GB 240/256GB 480/512GB 960GB/1TB
Micron M600 $80 $140 $260 $450
Crucial MX100 $75 $112 $213 -
Crucial M550 $90 $150 $272 $480
SanDisk Ultra II $80 $110 $200 $433
SanDisk Extreme Pro - $190 $370 $590
Samsung SSD 850 Pro $120 $200 $380 $700
Samsung SSD 840 EVO $82 $140 $236 $500
OCZ ARC 100 $75 $120 $240 -
Plextor M6S $75 $135 $280 -
Intel SSD 530 $84 $140 $250 -

Since the M600 is an OEM-only product, it will not be available through the usual retail channels. Thus the pricing will depend highly on the quantity ordered, so the prices in the above table are just approximate prices for orders of one that Micron provided us. The M600 enjoys a price premium over the MX100, but I suspect that in high volumes the M600 pricing should drop close to the MX100 levels, perhaps even lower.

All in all, I would have liked to see Micron going after Samsung's 850 Pro and SanDisk's Extreme Pro with the M600, but I do see the logic behind sticking to the high volume mainstream market. In terms of performance, features, and price, the M600 is a solid product and I am certain that PC OEMs will see the appeal in MLC NAND and high endurance over competitors' TLC offerings, especially in the more professional-oriented PC segments.

It will nevertheless be interesting to see how the separation of retail and OEM product teams plays out for Micron. I am eager to see whether Micron can optimize Dynamic Write Acceleration for heavier workloads and finally provide competition in the high-end SSD market as well. For now, this is a good first step, but it might take a revision or two before Dynamic Write Acceleration can reach its full potential.

Power Consumption
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • milli - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    The MX100 already had terrible service time. The M600 is even worse.
    I mean if it's even worse than this showing the MX100 delivered (http://techreport.com/r.x/adata-sp610/db2-100-writ... then forget about it.
  • milli - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    http://techreport.com/r.x/adata-sp610/db2-100-writ...
    Link got messed.
  • BedfordTim - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    If service times are such an issue why did Tech Report give the MX100 an Editor's Choice award?
  • milli - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    Because everybody is a sucker for low prices.
  • menting - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    i guess you go out and buy the fastest, regardless of price then?
  • milli - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    Obviously not. I'm just giving one of the main reasons why the MX100 wins so many awards.
  • Samus - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    It's still a better drive than competing products in its price segment. The only other drive that comes close is the 840 Evo (which apparently has some huge performance bugs on static data - and support is terrible...the bug has existed for over a year.)

    You could consider spending more money on an Intel drive or something from Sandisk, but most consumers need something "reliable-enough" and price is always the driving factor in consumer purchases. If that weren't true, you wouldn't see so many Chevy Cobalt's and Acer PC's.

    The irony is, for price and reliability, the best route is a used Intel SSD320 (or even an X25-M) off eBay for $60 bucks. They never fail and have a 15 year lifespan under typical consumer workloads. They're still SATA 3Gbps, but many people won't notice the difference if coming from a hard disk. Considering the write performance of many cheap SSD's anyway (such as the M500) the performance of a 4 year old Intel SSD might even still be superior.
  • Cellar Door - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    My X-25M failed after 2 years of use. So please don't use the word 'never' - Intel sent me a 320 as a replacement, due to 3 year warranty. Performance wise, it's ancient but still an ssd.
  • Samus - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link

    Like many SSD's, they are prone to failure from overfapping.
  • Lerianis - Friday, October 3, 2014 - link

    Eh? Overwriting, I think you mean. That said, all of these drives should be able to handle 20GB's write per day at least for years without issues.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now