Intel Z87 Motherboard Review with Haswell: Gigabyte, MSI, ASRock and ASUS
by Ian Cutress on June 27, 2013 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Intel
- MSI
- Gigabyte
- ASRock
- Asus
- Haswell
- Z87
- Shark Bay
- Lynx Point
ASUS Z87-Pro Software
Z87 software updates seem to be a trend, and ASUS’ AI Suite gets a boost from the last generation. The number moves to AI Suite III, and the visuals are tuned to work with the new Dual Intelligent Processors IV on the motherboard itself. DIP4 is now an option to tune all areas of the system – TPU (Turbo), EPU (energy), DIGI+ (power control) and Fan Xpert 2 (fans).
When the software is first loaded this is the main screen, offering a one button optimization tool on the far left as well as additional options for the extra modes on the right hand side, showing the results of some of the settings selected. At the bottom is a quick series of details about the CPU, voltage, temperature and fan controls. Ideally I would like to see the name of the motherboard being used, as well as the BIOS version and the CPU installed as well to make this info complete.
From this main screen each of the separate sections in its own small window has additional buttons to provide popups showing the settings, for example the fans:
4-Way Optimization
The tool on the far left, when clicked, gives the user a set of additional options such that the 4WO can work effectively – such as labeling the location of fans, what settings to tune with the processor, and how to deal with energy saving and the fans themselves:
When enabled the system will test each part of the system to find a stable medium based on the advanced options. The system may need to reset once or twice to find the right default settings for the CPU overclock, whereby settings at boot time can dictate how far the system can be pushed.
We will go more into the results of 4WO in the overclocking section.
TPU
For manual adjustments of overclocks, users need to head over to the TPU option. On the front screen we get basic options relating to BCLK, Ratio and CPU Cache Ratios:
But by clicking through to the voltage screen we get a more thorough option list on dealing with voltages.
The best bits here are the graphs showing how voltage adjusts as the CPU moves in and out of power states. By adjusting the sliders for offset and OC voltages, the graph will change in various ways in order to respond to changes. What I would love to see, personally, is something like this in the BIOS, along with options for load line calibration. Obviously with OS software we have more to play with in terms of responsiveness, but I hope it can be moved into the BIOS to help overclockers.
EPU
In the EPU section we can adjust features to save power, such as when to shut the monitor off, or configure maximum CPU power draw such that the CPU will push as much voltage and MHz only up to a limit. USB power states can also be managed, and fan profiles adjusted to draw less power.
DIGI+ Power Control
As more manufacturers are jumping on the digital power bandwagon, it opens up options for the user to adjust how the power delivery of the motherboard reacts to requests for power and current. Most overclockers with some experience are used to discussing Load Line Calibration for dealing with voltages, but when pushing overclock limits it can help to give the power delivery an extra margin of headroom as not to limit the overclocks (as long as the user understands potential risks). ASUS were a prominent member in introducing digital power delivery options to consumers, and the DIGI+ Power Control in AI Suite 3 is the next step in presenting these options.
Fan Xpert 2
One of the major developments over the past 4 years of motherboards has been how to deliver the right level of fan controls to users. ASUS have been at the top of that game with Fan Xpert, and implementing it for AI Suite 3 gives users to look at fan profiles at-a-glance as well as offer predefined menu options for Silent, Standard, Turbo or Full Speed modes.
Coupled with this is an Auto Tuning option that tests the fan profiles to find the actual power-RPM profile of each fan connected to any header on board.
AI Suite Menu
By clicking on the pull down menu from above, users have access to the AI Suite 3 menu. This menu contains more of the regular options from the old version of AI Suite on Z77 – AI Charger+, EZ Update (now integrated), USB Charger+, USB 3.0 Boost, Network iControl, USB BIOS Flashback, Wi-Fi Go and Wi-Fi Engine.
AI Charger+
With the USB Charging protocols there is a defined specification for varying amounts of current through a USB port. Typically a PC will adjust the current to ensure minimum working coherency and provide the best experience to keep the data stream intact. Unfortunately this means that the USB port does not know if you want to transmit data over a device or use the USB port purely as a charging device. Motherboard manufacturers, with the right set of controls, can force the USB port to provide more power than needed – this is the essence of AI Charger+. If your device that needs charging supports the BC 1.1 standard for mobile devices, this ASUS program will force USB 3.0 ports to triple their default current to enhance charging capabilities.
EZ Update
More motherboard manufacturers are coming to the realization that most users to not update the motherboard drivers above those found on the driver disk unless there is an immediate need due to errors or compatibility, and thus the user misses out on software and driver updates as they are improved. Having a software tool that automatically downloads and updates software/drivers is almost a mini-savior: one click and everything can be updated to the latest. MSI have had good success with the Live Update 5 software for several generations, and ASUS’ answer to this is EZ Update. EZ Update is designed to probe the ASUS servers for the motherboard being used for the most up to date software/drivers, and this is compared to a local inspection of the items, leaving any discrepancies up for download.
Unfortunately the tool with ASUS still exists more as an extra window tool rather than a part of AI Suite, and I am not sure whether it was because I was fully up to date or because I was testing this motherboard pre-launch, but I was offered no updates after a fresh install from my media sample.
USB Charger+
For devices that do not adhere to the BC 1.1 standard for tablets and smartphones (such as camera chargers or other devices), ASUS have provided USB Charger+ to perform pretty much the same functionality for all devices but to a single USB 3.0 port which also charges at the higher rate when the machine is under sleep, hibernate or shutdown.
USB 3.0 Boost
In recent ASUS reviews, we have covered USB 3.0 Boost in extensive detail – due to the aged nature of the Windows 7 USB driver, it can be replaced with a version that prioritizes packet size over latency for a faster experience. In previous versions of USB 3.0 Boost ASUS had enabled UASP for ASMedia USB 3.0 and an enhanced BOT for Intel USB 3.0 – for Z87 the UASP element is dropped as it is now a native part of Windows 7, but also the Z87 USB 3.0 driver can take care of the ASMedia USB 3.0 without an additional driver. This essentially means that both the ASMedia and Intel USB 3.0 run at similar speeds and are able to use the enhanced BOT protocol afforded by USB 3.0 Boost in Windows 7.
Network iControl
As with a couple of other motherboards in this review, the trend in the motherboard industry is to provide software to prioritize programs over others for network access. Where MSI has the Killer NIC and ASRock has XFast LAN (cFos), ASUS has Network iControl which is designed in-house unlike the others. Network iControl gives a few predefined options for general priority settings although users can create custom profiles as required.
Wi-Fi Go! Remote Desktop
One last feature I wanted to test was Wi-Fi Go, which offers a remote desktop function. Personally I think being able to remote desktop into your PC from a smartphone is a nice idea, allowing a user to control a HTPC or WiDi enabled NAS at will. I downloaded the app for my SGS2 and connected it to my PC:
For whatever reason the 1440p resolution of my test bed did not translate well to the screen on my SGS2, resulting in what looked like a 1440p -> 1080p downscaled image then compressed on my screen. Nonetheless I attempted to run a couple of benchmarks:
Performance over regular testing was down a few FPS overall, and due to the lag both the image on the smartphone and the screen did not correspond to the FPS number being shown. But this system is more for that HTPC testing rather than actually playing a game with a smartphone via a PC.
58 Comments
View All Comments
ShieTar - Thursday, June 27, 2013 - link
Is there a special reason not to test the POST times and DPC latency of the Gigabyte Board? Its power consumption is quiet impressive, and whatever design measures have been used to achieve it do not seem to negatively affect the overall performance. So it would be interesting to complete the picture with the two measurements which are missing.IanCutress - Thursday, June 27, 2013 - link
DPC Latency on the Gigabyte during testing was jumping around a fair bit, hitting 800+, though that is more likely due to the early BIOS revision. I need to run the POST test (as the results are strangely missing from my database) as well as the DPC test on a newer BIOS. Since I started testing almost every manufacturer has released newer BIOSes (as is always the way coming up to a launch) and I really have to lay the hammer down as testing a whole new BIOS takes a good 30 hours or so start to finish, so when I'm locked in that's it. That in a way does give an unfair advantage to the board I test last, but there's not a lot else I can do. I am still getting emails of BIOS updates for these boards as of yesterday.Ian
tribbles - Thursday, June 27, 2013 - link
Am I wrong in thinking that Gigabyte hasn't been doing well in the DPC Latency Test since Z77? If so, that's kind of surprising, since Gigabyte seems to be a "go-to" brand for digital audio workstation builders.IanCutress - Wednesday, July 10, 2013 - link
I retested the UD3H on the F5 (public) BIOS, and it scored 164. The two next boards I have in for review got 160 and 157, which points fingers to the DPC on Haswell being 150+ regardless of motherboard. This might be a fundamental issue.Timur Born - Saturday, July 27, 2013 - link
Run Prime95 (or turn off CPU power features) while measuring DPC latencies to see how much CPU power saving features affect DPCs.jhonabundance - Thursday, August 28, 2014 - link
great share http://asus.comjhonabundance - Thursday, August 28, 2014 - link
this is the best share http://asus.comRick83 - Thursday, June 27, 2013 - link
Maybe a bad choice to use two different ways of graphing the Rightmark results.Being consistent with regard to cutting off the irrelevant bit of the graph makes it a much easier read.
Now it appears at first glance as though the Gigabyte board is much better in THD+N, simply because the differences were so minuscule in the dynamic range bit.
On another note: Shouldn't it be more interesting to use a standardized input instead of the input of the board? In the current protocol a good output could be handicapped by a bad input, and conversely. For most users the output is much more important than the input, so it might be better to test it independently? I would recommend using a USB soundcard as an easy means of doing this test on the same machine, without changing the setup protocol too much.
And finally - I seem to remember Rightmark results for earlier reviews - it would be interesting to have those (or maybe a reference soundcard?) as comparison in the same graph. After all, for DPC you maintain a large cross-platform table as well.
Nice thorough initial review, those nitpicks withstanding.
IanCutress - Thursday, June 27, 2013 - link
Unfortunately I can't adjust the engine to represent from 0 for negative values, I don't have access to the low level options. I forwarded it on as an issue.I'd love to use a standardized input with RMAA. I guess it would be good to get a sound card with an input that supercedes the output of the motherboard and put it through that way, and hopefully there won't be a driver conflict along the line. I'll see what I can do to get in the hardware for that, although many soundcards are designed more for output and the input dynamic range/distortion might be the limiting factor as is the case on motherboards. Something like the Xonar Essence STX has a 118 dBA input with -113 dBA THD+N which might be a good starting point.
Our RMAA testing for Z87 has changed a little from Z77 to make it more of an efficiency test rather than an out-the-box test as audio is such a varied playing field. RMAA is very sensitive to certain windows settings and volumes for example such that with the right combination it was very easy to show A>B or B>A depending on how the OS felt it should be set up. The new testing regimen for RMAA should iron out those issues but the results are not exactly comparable to Z77 for that reason. There are so many wrong ways to set up RMAA it can be difficult (and a learning experience) to get it right.
Ian
popej - Thursday, June 27, 2013 - link
Nice to see you are planning steps in right direction. Using reference card for measurements is a proper solution. Be aware, that separate card add complications to the test, for example you will have to take care about ground loops and signal level matching. Professional card with balanced input could help a lot.