Intel's Medfield & Atom Z2460 Arrive for Smartphones: It's Finally Here
by Anand Lal Shimpi on January 10, 2012 8:00 PM ESTFinal Words
Intel finally did it. After almost five years of talking about getting into mobile phone form factors, Intel went out and built a reference platform that proved what they've been saying was possible all along. Furthermore, Intel also finally landed a couple of partners who are willing to show their support by incorporating Medfield into their product portfolio. The releases are still a few months away at the earliest (possibly even longer for Motorola) but it's much better news than Intel has ever reported before in this space.
Medfield (left 1) vs. Moorestown (right 2)
The partnerships aren't out of pity either: Medfield is fast. I firmly believe had it been released a year ago it would have dominated the Android smartphone market from the very start. Even today it appears to deliver better CPU performance than anything on the market, despite only having a single core. GPU performance is still not as fast as what's in the A5 but it's competitive with much of the competition today, and I fully expect the dual-core version of Medfield to rectify this problem.
Based on the data Intel shared with us as well, the x86 power problem appears to be a myth - at least when it comes to Medfield. I'm still not fully convinced until we're able to test a Medfield based phone ourselves, but power efficiency at the chip level doesn't seem to be a problem.
Medfield and the Atom Z2460 are a solid starting point. Intel finally has a chip that they can deliver to the market and partners to carry it in. Intel also built a very impressive reference platform that could lead to some very interesting disruptions in the market.
While I'd like to say that Intel's Medfield team can now breathe a sigh of relief, their work is far from over - especially with more competitive ARM based SoCs showing up later this year. I'm really interested to see where this goes in the next 12 months...
164 Comments
View All Comments
guilmon19 - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2011/5/19/the...brightside actually does a very nice benchmark and analysis on the memory bandwith problem that arm has.
Exophase - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link
That was with an old i.MX51. The situation is different with newer Cortex-A9 SoCs, especially where the SoC designer didn't botch the main memory latency.grrrrr - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link
intel = FAKEEEEEEBOOOOOOO
Hector2 - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link
grow upshaolin95 - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link
what an awesome comment...what are you 5?Stuka87 - Thursday, January 12, 2012 - link
Shouldn't that be "FAAAAAAKE" as the 'e' is silent. So extending the 'e' out like that has no change on the sound of the word.If you are going to troll, at least do it properly.
chiddy - Sunday, January 15, 2012 - link
+1Morg. - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link
ARM's memory problem ???Year-old 40+nm parts are slightly slower than brand new Intel 32nm ?
yes arm has a memory problem indeed ..
the real market situation for medfield will probably be a LOT different and as usual Intel will still get some market space thanks to murky deals and stuff :p
guilmon14 - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link
I wasn't trying to dis ARM what i meant to show, with the link, is that ARM A8 cpu performance would be just as, if not more, then the current atom if it had similar memory performance.blazermaniac - Saturday, January 14, 2012 - link
murky deals...?