Samsung Galaxy Tab - The AnandTech Review
by Vivek Gowri on December 23, 2010 9:48 AM ESTSamsung Galaxy Tab - Conclusion
Okay, let’s start with the easy conclusion - the Galaxy Tab is the best Android tablet on the market and probably the second best overall to the iPad. With that said, the iPad is still a superior device by far. It’s not a hardware issue; Samsung did a first-class job with the design of the Galaxy Tab. It’s fast, it’s well built, it’s aesthetically pleasing, and the screen is very good. Sasmung has come out of the gate with a benchmark device for 7” tablets going forward.
So what then? It’s the software. Or, to be more specific, Froyo. It’s too similar to a smartphone right now, too much of the same experience repeated on a 200% scale. To avoid that, companies really only have two options - either wait for a more tablet-centric Android 3.0, or skin the hell out of Froyo and optimize the UI for tablet implementations. There’s a reason that Motorola, Dell, and HTC are waiting until Honeycomb to release their respective tablets. And then you have companies like NotionInk, who has completely scrapped Froyo’s UI and come up with something new altogether in “Eden”, their reimagination of Android as it should be for tablets.
I’m guessing Samsung pushed ahead with the Galaxy Tab to get a jump on the Android tablet market at large, and they deserve to be commended for being the first high profile manufacturer to take a step. Unfortunately, they ended up leaving Froyo mostly alone. They added TouchWiz 3.0, but it’s just a glorified version of the skin you’ll find on your friendly, neighborhood Galaxy S phone. The custom mail and calendar apps are simply not enough to make up for an otherwise undistinguished tablet experience. The core Google apps simply are not tablet-ready, so until they are, it’s up to Samsung.
Samsung is definitely trying their hardest, even releasing a Galaxy Tab emulator for the Android SDK. But for now and even the foreseeable future, they’re not going to have the full-blown ecosystem that Apple had specifically for the iPad at launch. Where does this leave the Galaxy Tab? I’ll say that if you can hold off, it’s probably worth waiting to see what the next generation of tablets holds, but for right now, it’s one of the more competent tablets on the market, and as Google and Samsung build a platform around it, it will only continue to improve.
97 Comments
View All Comments
sciwizam - Thursday, December 23, 2010 - link
Wikipedia has:Dimensions 190.09 mm (7.484 in) (h)
120.45 mm (4.742 in) (w)
11.98 mm (0.472 in) (d)
Weight 380 g (0.84 lb)
These make a lot more sense.
VivekGowri - Thursday, December 23, 2010 - link
Fixed, so sorry - it got pushed live before I had a chance to edit that part.medi01 - Friday, December 24, 2010 - link
"HD video recording is sadly not supported"Having in mind how "huge and powerfull" are the lens "HD resolution" would make sense, wouldn't it?
I understand, when this BS comes from usual customers, but when it comes from a reviewer, sigh...
VivekGowri - Friday, December 24, 2010 - link
Why Samsung decided to spec their bigger, better device with a lower end camera than the Galaxy S phones is an openly debatable question that I have no real answer to, but it doesn't support HD video recording. What else am I supposed to say?medi01 - Friday, December 24, 2010 - link
Obviously neither HD video nor 5+ megapixels photos make any sense on devices with tiny lens.Whether they upscale or produce "HD" noise is completely irrelevant, mentioning "lack of HD video" as a real disadvantage reiterates the myth and confuses the customers.
NesuD - Thursday, December 23, 2010 - link
You're getting things wrong on the other comparison units as well. Droid X Nand is 8GB integrated and a 16 GB micro SD. This is a well publicized spec of the Droid X from launch. Fact checking and verification is an essential part of Journalism that seems to be slipping here at Anandtech of late.VivekGowri - Saturday, December 25, 2010 - link
I copied that part of the table out of the Fascinate review, so I'll look into it. But I'd like to point out that this is literally just a spec table, don't call our journalistic integrity into question based on that alone.aniallator - Thursday, December 23, 2010 - link
You have posted the dimensions and weight values for the iphone 4 (well those values match) all other areas of the Samsung galaxy tab hardware information appear to be correct.veri745 - Thursday, December 23, 2010 - link
The posted dimensions have to be wrong.misterjohnnyt - Thursday, December 23, 2010 - link
Listing Proper Dimensions FAIL