The Inland Performance Plus 2TB SSD Review: Phison's E18 NVMe Controller Tested
by Billy Tallis on May 13, 2021 8:00 AM ESTConclusion
With drives like the Inland Performance Plus, Phison's E18 controller has kept them in competition for the consumer SSD performance crown. The Inland Performance Plus is an extremely fast drive that sets a few new performance records, but more often it ends up tied or slightly slower than a competing PCIe 4.0 flagship SSD. The difference between this drive and other top PCIe 4.0 drives like the WD Black SN850 would not be noticeable during real-world usage, so the question of which one is fastest is more about bragging rights than tangible benefits.
Phison is the only company already on their second generation of PCIe 4.0 controllers, but they still have some room for improvement. The Inland Performance Plus consistently had high power consumption and poor efficiency during our testing. It's not completely out of line for a high-end drive that needs to prioritize performance over power efficiency, but the bar is being raised by the in-house controllers from several of the major NAND manufacturers. A second round of Phison E18-based products will be coming to market soon using Micron's 176L TLC rather than the current 96L TLC, and that should enable slightly improved performance and power efficiency. It might be enough to bump the new E18 drives into first place on more performance tests, and will definitely help keep this market segment highly competitive.
Our most difficult (and least realistic) tests revealed that the Inland Performance Plus and the Phison E18 controller and firmware also have some difficulties with performance consistency, for random read latency and for write performance where the SLC caching behavior occasionally leaves something to be desired. These aren't serious performance problems, but they are blemishes that we would prefer not to have on top-tier products. Firmware improvements may be able to help these issues, but a lot of the brands selling Phison drives aren't very good about making firmware updates available to end users.
PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD Prices May 13, 2021 |
|||||||
480-512 GB | 960 GB-1 TB | 2 TB | |||||
Inland Performance Plus Phison E18 |
$189.99 (19¢/GB) | $379.99 (19¢/GB) | |||||
Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus Phison E18 |
$199.98 (20¢/GB) | $449.15 (22¢/GB) | |||||
Mushkin GAMMA Phison E18 |
$259.99 (26¢/GB) | $499.99 (25¢/GB) | |||||
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Innogrit IG5236 |
$179.99 (18¢/GB) | $349.99 (17¢/GB) | |||||
Samsung 980 PRO Samsung Elpis |
$119.99 (24¢/GB) | $199.99 (20¢/GB) | $399.99 (20¢/GB) | ||||
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Phison E16 |
$89.98 (18¢/GB) | $159.98 (16¢/GB) | $399.99 (20¢/GB) | ||||
WD Black SN850 WD G2 |
$128.74 (26¢/GB) | $199.99 (20¢/GB) | $399.99 (20¢/GB) | ||||
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite SM2267 (4ch) |
$139.99 (14¢/GB) | $259.99 (13¢/GB) | |||||
PCIe 3.0 SSDs: | |||||||
SK hynix Gold P31 | $74.99 (15¢/GB) | $134.99 (13¢/GB) | |||||
Samsung 970 EVO Plus | $89.99 (18¢/GB) | $159.90 (16¢/GB) | $299.99 (15¢/GB) | ||||
WD Black SN750 | $69.99 (14¢/GB) | $129.99 (13¢/GB) | $309.99 (15¢/GB) |
Micro Center's in store only pricing for the Inland Performance Plus makes it the cheapest Phison E18 drive on the market, though Sabrent's more widely available Rocket 4 Plus is only $10 more for the 1TB model. With the exception of the Inland, most of the E18 drives seem to be priced at or above where the other second-wave PCIe 4.0 flagships are. The cheapest of the new PCIe 4.0 flagships is ADATA's Gammix S70 using Innogrit's controller. The older Phison E16 drives with TLC NAND are starting to get harder to find, but some such as the Sabrent Rocket 4.0 are a good mid-point between the latest top of the line drives and mainstream PCIe 3.0 drives.
For consumers with access to Micro Center's in-store pricing, the Inland Performance Plus is a reasonable choice since it's a bit cheaper than the flagships from Samsung and WD—but keep in mind that Micro Center is only offering a three year warranty rather than the usual five. For everyone else who has to deal with the online prices on other brands' Phison E18 drives, going for the WD Black SN850 instead makes more sense, especially for the 2TB models. The WD Black has more consistent performance and substantially less heat output.
However, all of the high-end PCIe 4.0 drives still carry a very steep price premium over even the best PCIe 3.0 drives. Recent increases in retail SSD prices have affected mainstream models more than the premium PCIe 4.0 drives, but the price gap is going to remain pretty wide. Those more mainstream models still provide almost as much real-world performance and a wider range of capacity options. Until a more compelling use case for PCIe 4.0 performance shows up, saving $50-100 by sticking with PCIe 3.0 storage seems like a great way to deal with high prices on other PC components.
118 Comments
View All Comments
FatFlatulentGit - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
Is there a reason the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus never shows up in the benches? I'm baffled that AT didn't review that one as it uses the Phison E18 and came out about six months ago. You don't even include it in your bench results and it's a flagship PCIe4 M.2 drive. What gives?Linustechtips12#6900xt - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
could just be they didn't think of it,Death666Angel - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
They probably didn't get sampled one. Sabrent seems more like a non-brand type option and thus likely does not have much of a PR presence.Billy Tallis - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
The timing of the first round of review samples of the Rocket 4 Plus didn't work out for us, because I was still putting the finishing touches on the new test suite and had a bit of a backlog of other Gen4 drives to review first. By the time I was ready to start testing an E18 drive, Inland was offering to sample several of their drives, and they're also a frequently requested brand. It wouldn't make sense to review the Rocket 4 Plus now because it's the same underlying hardware as the Inland Performance Plus. We'll wait for the 176L NAND before doing another E18 review.Chaser - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
Until Microsoft unshackles Windows from the magnetic Hard disk era, the perceptible difference between most SSDs in Windows desktop is miniscule. But I suppose these reviews and their hairsplitting synthetic benchmarks get clicks.Marlin1975 - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
What are you talking about? Performance between platter disk and SSD/M.2 is day and night.evilpaul666 - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
There is a huge difference between rust and flash, but we could use some major software improvements and architectural improvements to PCs to move them forward. Maybe persistent memory? A better file system that uses something like compression and checksums on everything similar to ZFS?GeoffreyA - Thursday, May 13, 2021 - link
NTFS has had compression since NT 3.51 or 4, and ReFS, checksums.DougMcC - Sunday, May 16, 2021 - link
It's great and all but linux/mac do most disk intensive activities close to twice as fast. Mac and Linux have completely taken over at my company because of this.GeoffreyA - Sunday, May 16, 2021 - link
Haven't got much experience with Linux but yes, I believe its performance beats Windows on a lot of points.