CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged SSD Review
by Ganesh T S on September 4, 2019 9:00 AM ESTMiscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks
The performance consistency for real-world applications was looked at in the previous section. We recently added a test to determine the effectiveness of the thermal solution for sustained workloads. After deleted the SSD volume, a fio workload was set up to write sequential data to the raw drive with a block size of 128K and iodepth of 32 to cover 90% of the drive capacity. The internal temperature, instantaneous write data rate, and total amount of data written in total till that point of time were recorded.
Sequential Write to 90% of Disk Capacity - Performance Consistency |
The Solo Hawk has no trouble managing a sustained write workload. The temperature at the end of writing 90% of the disk space in a continuous manner was just 53C
The above exercise also allows us to determine the SLC cache size and/or the amount of data that can be written in one shot without a drop in the write data rate. The graphs below plot the transfer rate and the total data transfer amount from the start of the fio workload to the approximate timestamp at which the transfer rate shows a significant drop.
Sustained Writes - Characteristics |
We can see around 5GB of data getting written at the peak rate (450 MBps+) before the sustained write speed gets lowered to around 400 MBps.
Power Consumption
The CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged SSD is a bus-powered device, and it is given that the peak power consumption can't go beyond 5W to maintain compatibility with as wide a range of systems as possible. It is still relevant to take a fine-grained look at the power consumption profile. Using the Plugable USBC-TKEY, the bus power consumption for the product was tracked while the CrystalDiskMark workloads were processed. The workloads were set up with an interval time of 30s.
Drive Power Consumption - CrystalDiskMark Workloads |
The peak power consumption is around 4.2W, and the unit idles at around 0.9W. The write workloads show interesting power consumption behavior, with the power numbers taking 15 - 20 seconds to return to the idling stage after the completion of the workload.
TRIM Support
Support for TRIM is an oft-requested feature in flash drives. It is important to maintain long-term performance consistency. CRU claims that the Solo Hawk supports TRIM as well as UASP. CyberShadow's trimcheck is a quick tool to get the status of TRIM support. However, it presents a couple of challenges: it sometimes returns INDETERMINATE after processing, and, in case TRIM comes back as NOT WORKING or not kicked in yet, it is not clear whether the blame lies with the OS / file system or the storage controller / bridge chip or the SSD itself. In order to get a clear idea, our TRIM check routine adopts the following strategy:
- Format the SSD in NTFS
- Load the trimcheck program into it and execute
- Use the PowerShell command Optimize-Volume -DriveLetter T -ReTrim -Verbose (assuming that the drive connected to the storage bridge is mounted with the drive letter T)
- Re-execute trimcheck to determine status report
Conclusions can be made based on the results from the last two steps.
The Solo Hawk supports TRIM, as advertised.
Pricing
The table below presents the pricing information for the various SSDs that we have used as comparison points in the preceding sections. The 500GB Solo Hawk is priced at $311. The internal SSD costs $67 when bought separately. This points to an approximate enclosure cost of around $244, which is a considerable premium over run-of-the-mill enclosures.
External Flash Storage Devices - Pricing | ||||
Product | Model Number | Capacity (GB) | Street Price (USD) | Price per GB (USD/GB) |
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB | MU-PA500B/AM | 500 | $90 | 0.18 |
Kingston HyperX Savage EXO 480GB | SHSX100480G | 480 | $87 | 0.18125 |
SanDisk Extreme 510 480GB | SDSSDEXTW-480G-G25 | 480 | $88 | 0.18333 |
G-DRIVE slim SSD USB-C 500GB | 0G05272 | 500 | $220 | 0.44 |
CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged SSD 500GB | 71000-1926-1200 | 500 | $311 | 0.622 |
The Solo Hawk definitely demands a premium due to its rugged nature - so, it is also important to take a look at how it compares against other rugged SSDs in the market.
Competitive Landscape
Consumers looking for rugged SSDs (particularly outdoor content creators) have typically looked at the LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt USB-C SSD or the G-Technology G-DRIVE mobile SSD. The CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged Portable SSD is now another alternative with similar performance numbers.
Q3 2019 Rugged SSDs - Key Metrics | |||
Metric | CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged SSD | LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt USB-C SSD | G-Technology G-DRIVE mobile SSD |
IP Rating | IP68 | IP54 | IP67 |
Waterproof | OK with immersion for 3 days at 10 ft. | OK with splashes of water | OK with immersion for 30 minutes at 3 ft. |
Warranty | 2 years with Data Recovery Service | 3 years with Rescue Data Recovery Service | 5 years |
Drop Test (MIL-STD-810G 516.6) | 10 ft. | 6.6 ft. | 9.8 ft. |
UV Exposure (MIL-STD-810G 505.5) | 24 hrs. | - | - |
Sand / Dust Exposure (MIL-STD-810G 510.5) | No ingress up to 24 hours | Limited protection against ingress | No ingress |
Freezing Rain (MIL-STD-810G 521.3) | Up to 24 hours | - | - |
Salt Fog (MIL-STD-810G 509.5) | Up to 24 hours | - | - |
Chemicals (MIL-STD-810G 504.1) | OK with immersion for 1 hr. at 12 ft. | - | - |
Altitude (MIL-STD-810G 500.5) | Up to 30000 ft. | - | - |
Crush Resistance | Up to 2500 lbs. | Up to 2205 lbs. | Up to 1000 lbs. |
Connectivity / Performance | USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C / Up to 555 MBps | Thunderbolt 3 / 510 MBps | USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C / Up to 560 MBps |
Pricing (500GB) | $311 | $295 | $110 |
The table above compares the three products (500GB versions) on key ruggedness metrics and pricing. It can be seen that the Solo Hawk can be subjected to more extreme environmental conditions compared to the other two. In fact, the Solo Hawk can operate between -20C and 50C, while LaCie and G-Technology do not give any operating temperature ranges for their products. Consumers who don't want any compromises on the ruggedness aspect will probably not mind paying the associated price premium for the Solo Hawk.
Final Words
The CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged SSD ticks all the boxes in terms of what a consumer can expect from a SATA SSD in a USB 3.1 Gen 2 enclosure. The bundled cables are amongst the longest that we have seen in this product segment, and the enclosure has no trouble in preventing the internal SSD from overheating. The differentiating aspect is obviously the rugged nature of the product.
The CRU ioSafe Solo Hawk Rugged SSD - Moments after Getting Run Over by a Mini-Van
The Solo Hawk is crush-resistant up to 2500 lbs., and can withstand drops from as high as 10 ft. It carries a IP68 rating, and can operate even after submersion in 10 ft. deep salt water for as long as 3 days. It is also weather-proof and resistant to chemicals such as oils and hydraulic fluids. The SSD is also rated for operation at high altitudes (up to 30000 ft.). The data recovery service (DRS) and the bundled Genie Timeline backup software are excellent value additions. All these features carry a reasonable premium.
We would love to see CRU put out a diskless version of the Solo Hawk priced between $200 and $250. It is likely that pricing flexibility is lost due to the sourcing of the internal SSD from a third party. The ease of disassembly also leads us to believe that end users will have no trouble installing their own SSD in such a scenario. Unfortunately, CRU has released only a 500GB ($311) and a 1TB version ($385) of the Solo Hawk. If one needs a robust and rugged portable drive, and cost is not much of an issue, there is no doubt that the Solo Hawk Rugged Portable SSD is currently the best option in the market.
16 Comments
View All Comments
Howling Mad Merdoc - Wednesday, September 4, 2019 - link
Can we get the twitter feed on the main page again? I for one really miss it.Cullinaire - Monday, September 9, 2019 - link
I for one don't miss it at all.cfenton - Wednesday, September 4, 2019 - link
Does the warranty cover failures due to extreme conditions? I ask because a lot of phone manufacturers won't cover water damage even though their phones are IP rated. I can understand why they don't, but I do find it misleading for general consumers.A warranty that doesn't cover failures from extreme conditions would be even more misleading with this product. The only reason to buy one of these is if you need to use it in extreme conditions.
fneuner - Wednesday, September 4, 2019 - link
I have not had much good luck with ioSafe products. Lots of USB3 failures.maxparker - Tuesday, October 6, 2020 - link
Nice review! Thanks to the author! I want to share a link to an excellent service https://grademiners.com/Here you can order a high-quality essay of any complexity. I've been using this service myself for quite some time now and I recommend it to all of you!
Stevenfox1 - Friday, October 9, 2020 - link
This is an amazing gadget, and it is very durable. Please keep up the good workhttps://wealthgee.com/best-business-to-start-with-...
dalebeck - Friday, November 6, 2020 - link
Article is so convincing that I never stop https://www.testsmate.com/ myself to say something about it. You’re doing a great job ,Keep it up.Peter05 - Saturday, November 28, 2020 - link
Thanks for sharing this informative post. I will definitely be going to use this review if required and just want to add that if you're looking for any paper writing help then you can check https://www.cheapestessay.com/ as I already used it and got the desired results.carolsteffes - Tuesday, December 8, 2020 - link
<a href="dfgh">dcfg</a>carolsteffes - Tuesday, December 8, 2020 - link
sdf