Networking and Storage Performance

Networking and storage are two major aspects which influence our experience with any computing system. This section presents results from our evaluation of these aspects in the ASRock DeskMini 310. On the storage side, one option would be repetition of our strenuous SSD review tests on the drive(s) in the PC. Fortunately, to avoid that overkill, PCMark 8 has a storage bench where certain common workloads such as loading games and document processing are replayed on the target drive. Results are presented in two forms, one being a benchmark number and the other, a bandwidth figure. We ran the PCMark 8 storage bench on selected PCs and the results are presented below.

Futuremark PCMark 8 Storage Bench - Score

Futuremark PCMark 8 Storage Bench - Bandwidth

The NVMe SSD used in the DeskMini 310 allows it to be clear of the SATA-using PCs in the above graphs. However, the 240 GB capacity point and general performance prevent the drive from moving up the graph.

On the networking side, we restricted ourselves to the evaluation of the WLAN component. Our standard test router is the Netgear R7000 Nighthawk configured with both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz networks. The router is placed approximately 20 ft. away, separated by a drywall (as in a typical US building). A wired client is connected to the R7000 and serves as one endpoint for iperf evaluation. The PC under test is made to connect to either the 5 GHz (preferred) or 2.4 GHz SSID and iperf tests are conducted for both TCP and UDP transfers. It is ensured that the PC under test is the only wireless client for the Netgear R7000. We evaluate total throughput for up to 32 simultaneous TCP connections using iperf and present the highest number in the graph below.

Wi-Fi TCP Throughput

In the UDP case, we try to transfer data at the highest rate possible for which we get less than 1% packet loss.

Wi-Fi UDP Throughput (< 1% Packet Loss)

These bandwidth numbers are consistent with what one can expect from a 1x1 client radio.

Miscellaneous Performance Metrics Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • guidryp - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    They really need to do one of these with AMD APU chips for a decent mix of CPU/GPU performance.
  • Ashinjuka - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    They do. It supports Raven Ridge.

    https://www.asrock.com/nettop/AMD/DeskMini%20A300%...
  • guidryp - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    Thanks.
  • Death666Angel - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    I want the motherboard only to mod my own case around it (ATX PSU case mods are great). 150€ is just too much, unfortunately, especially for that "non-chipset" A300. 100€ and I'd think about it.
  • Lcs006 - Monday, March 18, 2019 - link

    Here U go!
    https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=583127994911
  • Irata - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    A side by side comparison of the Intel and AMD desk mini would have been nice.
    @AT: Could Asrock also supply you with the AMD based desk mini system ? Would be interesting since that is a first for them.
  • ganeshts - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    The DeskMini A300 came into our testbed just yesterday. I hope to have the review up in the next 3 - 4 weeks.
  • voodoobunny - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    Squeeee!
  • PixyMisa - Friday, March 15, 2019 - link

    Great, looking forward to it!
  • AdditionalPylons - Saturday, March 16, 2019 - link

    Yes!!! Very much looking forward to that review!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now