The MSI Z370I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (mITX) Motherboard Review: Balanced Gaming Diet
by Joe Shields on August 23, 2018 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- Intel
- MSI
- Mini ITX
- Coffee Lake
- Z370
Board Features
The Z370I Gaming Pro Carbon AC sets out to be a miniature gaming motherboard in their Z370 lineup. It has the RGB LEDs familiar with to the gaming scene as well as a good hardware base to support it. The board includes both wired and wireless Intel-based network connectivity, high RAM speed support up to DDR4 4600, M.2 slot, and the latest Realtek codecs along with Nahimic 2+ audio processing. 90% of ATX functionality in something around half the size.
MSI Z370I Gaming Pro Carbon AC | |
Warranty Period | 3 Years |
Product Page | LINK |
Price | $168 (Amazon) |
Size | Mini-ITX |
CPU Interface | LGA1151 |
Chipset | Intel Z370 |
Memory Slots (DDR4) | Two DDR4 Dual Channel Supporting 32GB Up to DDR4 4500 |
Network Connectivity / Wi-Fi | 1 x Intel I219V GbE 1 x 802.11ac + BT 4.2 |
Onboard Audio | Realtek ALC1220 7.1ch surround |
Video Outputs | 1 x HDMI (1.4) 1 x DisplayPort (1.2) |
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) | 1 x PCIe 3.0 |
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) | N/A |
Onboard SATA | 4 x RAID 0/1/5/10 |
Onboard SATA Express | None |
Onboard M.2 | 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA modes |
Onboard U.2 | None |
USB 3.1 | ASMedia ASM3142 1 x Type-A 1 x Type-C |
USB 3.0 | Chipset 2 x back panel 1 x internal header |
USB 2.0 | Chipset 2 x back panel 1 x internal header |
Power Connectors | 1 x 24-pin ATX 1 x 8-pin CPU |
Fan Headers | 1 x 4-pin CPU 1 x 4-pin System Fan |
IO Panel | 1 x Keyboard/Mouse 2 x USB 2.0 1 x HDMI 1 x DisplayPort 1 x USB 3.1 Type-A 1 x USB 3.1 Type-C 1 x CMOS reset 1 x RJ45 port 2 x USB 3.0 ports 1 x Wi-Fi Antenna 1 x 7.1-ch Audio jacks |
Block Diagram
Below is a snapshot of the block diagram from the manual. We are able to see clearly how each component is routed in the system. To note, we can see separate PCIe lanes for the M.2 slot as well as the four SATA ports.
Test Bed
As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC sub timings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.
Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.
Test Setup | |
Processor | Intel i7 8700K (6C/12T, 3.7G, 95W) |
Motherboard | SuperO C7Z370-CG-IW (BIOS 1.0c) |
Cooling | Corsair H115i |
Power Supply | Corsair HX750 |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16 Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16 (used in 2x 4/8GB capacity on dual Channel Platform |
Memory Settings | DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T |
Video Cards | ASUS Strix GTX 980 |
Hard Drive | Crucial MX300 1TB |
Optical Drive | TSST TS-H653G |
Case | Open Test Bed |
Operating System | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit |
Many thanks to...
We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this testbed specifically but is used in other testing.
Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.
The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.
The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.
Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review
Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.
The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.
Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review
Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler.
Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty.
Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.) and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin Molex connectors.
The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light workloads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty.
In order to cool these high-TDP HEDT CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed-loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options.
18 Comments
View All Comments
eek2121 - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
I would like to know how many people actually have multiple m.2 drives. I typically just install a single drive and if I need additional storage, fallback to SATA.I might have to pick up one of these and a Node 202 case or something for a small, compact gaming PC.
AdditionalPylons - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
I bought the ASRock AB350M Pro4 specifically because it had two M.2 slots. (One supporting both PCIe and S-ATA and the other one only S-ATA.) This allows for one very fast system and application drive and one bigger and cheaper as video editing scratch disk. This keeps the number of cables lower. Airflow can probably be debated because on one hand M.2 drives may not get much air, but on the other hand S-ATA PCBs are enclosed and don't get much airflow either.Price-wise M.2 S-ATA drives are almost the same as 2.5" S-ATA drives. I wouldn't be surprised if M.2 got cheaper than S-ATA over time due to the size of the enclosure and packaging, but it's more likely mostly due to supply and demand.
katsetus - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
In case of Node 202, the other m.2 slot would come in handy for expansion. I have the Asus z370i strix in it, and with a large gpu and non-modular psu, the hdd bracket would be a nuisance, and I am unsure if it would even fit. With storage-oriented (as compared to performance-oriented) nvme drives coming down in price, I would consider buying another nvme drive for expanded storage rather than a 2.5 inch ssd. At least in case of Node 202, that is.Hxx - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
m.2 drives have come down in price especially if you're going for a SATA m.2. Much more elegant, no cable clutter, and generally faster for a small price premiumDanNeely - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
For people going with even smaller new SFF cases than you're co, there might not even be an HDD bay at all making it m.2 or MacGyver for solid state drives.Gothmoth - Friday, August 24, 2018 - link
i have 3 x 1TB drives. in my TR system.Dug - Sunday, August 26, 2018 - link
I use 2 m.2 drives and wish I could use three, but there would be a performance hit for doing so.1 for OS and all apps. 2nd for games and editing files. Sata drive for back up and photos.
NobodyYouKnow - Wednesday, August 29, 2018 - link
I currently use 3 M.2 cards (2x PCIe M.2 & 1x Sata M.2) on the MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon. Got 1 PCIe M.2 in the top slot, the sata M.2 in the bottom, and an older PCIe M.2 in a M.2 PCIe x4 add-in adapter card (Akasa AK-PCCM2P-01). The latter is in the bottom PCIe x8 slot.The plan is to buy a 1TB PCIe M.2 that will go in the bottom M.2 slot and move the sata M.2 in the Akasa adapter. The card currently in the adapter is not enough for my games but will work just fine in a htpc.
prateekprakash - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
One query: is it possible to connect multiple headphones using the back audio jacks? ( Without using any splitter or external DAC, just those 3.5mm ports)I just need stereo audio through each headphones, nothing fancy...
DanNeely - Thursday, August 23, 2018 - link
AFAIK no boards support this unless you've got a pair that can connect over the optical port (do these exist?). The various analog pins are to support separate location channels for surround sound, so if you plug in multiple headphones the audio controller will think you've got front, and center, or side, or etc speakers.