Gateway M-152XL - Features and Specifications

Gateway M-152XL Specifications
Processor Core 2 Duo T8300 (2.40GHz 3MB 800FSB)
Chipset Intel PM965 + ICH8-ME
Memory 1x2048MB + 1x1024MB DDR2-667
Graphics ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 512MB
Display 15.4" WXGA (1280x800) Glossy
Samsung LTN154AT-A01
Hard Drive 160GB 7200RPM (Seagate Momentus 7200.2 ST9160823AS)
Optical Drive 8x DVDR SuperMulti Slot-load (TSSTcorp TS-T632A)
Networking Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
Intel 4965AGN WiFi
Bluetooth v2.0
V.92 56K Modem
Audio 2-Channel HD Audio (2.0 Speakers)
Battery 9-Cell 58Whr
Front Side Headphone/Mic Jacks
Left Side HDMI
Ethernet
2 x USB 2.0
Mini FireWire
ExpressCard/54
5-in-1 Flash Reader (MS, MS Pro, MMC, SD, xD)
WiFi On/Off switch
Cooling Exhaust
Right Side 1 x USB 2.0
Slot-load Optical Drive (DVDRW)
Back Side VGA
Power Connector
56K Modem
Kensington Lock
Operating System Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit
Dimensions 14" x 10" x 1.1"-1.50" (WxDxH)
Weight 6.29 lbs
Extras Fingerprint scanner
1.3MP webcam
Warranty 1-year standard
Price Superceded by M-153XL available at TigerDirect.com for $1100.
(M-153XL includes 2x2GB RAM, 200GB HDD, and 87Whr battery)

The specifications of the M-152XL are pure run-of-the-mill midrange options for current notebooks. The most noteworthy feature is probably the inclusion of an HDMI port (along with the HD 2600 GPU and slot-load DVDR mentioned already). Not only are there very few standout features on the M-152XL, but there are also several areas where Gateway is clearly taking cost-cutting measures. For example, they only include a 10/100 Ethernet connection, and as we will see later the LCD panel is one of the worst laptop displays we've ever tested. Despite the lackluster features, the M-152XL does have one thing going for it: price.

We already mentioned that the M-152XL is no longer in production, but current prices on the replacement M-153XL start at just over $1000, or $1100 if you want to go with a well-known supplier like TigerDirect.com. As mentioned in the above table, the M-153XL upgrades the memory, hard drive, and battery relative to the M-152XL. With 4GB of memory, we're a little disappointed that Gateway didn't upgrade the operating system to a 64-bit OS, but we appreciate the other upgrades. The battery in particular is an important upgrade, boasting 50% more battery life than the default M-152XL battery.

If you like the design of the M-152XL but don't need as much performance, Gateway offers a large number of similar notebooks with Intel and AMD processors priced as low as $600. What's really great about budget notebooks these days is that most companies now recognize that having enough memory to run Windows Vista properly is extremely important. All of the current Gateway notebooks we looked at come with at least 2GB of memory, and more often 3GB or 4GB. Some of the other M-series models also ship with Vista 64-bit. If you don't demand maximum performance, battery life, or quality (the LCD is really quite poor), and more importantly if you don't want to break the bank, the M-152XL/M-153XL or other M-series notebooks might be exactly what you need. Just don't be surprised when you discover that the lower price comes with some drawbacks.

Gateway M-152XL – Overview Gateway M-152XL – Thoughts and Summary
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    The same way as in http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=339...">previous articles, which is to say we ran the built-in test. It may not represent actual gameplay 100%, but that's not really possible with any benchmark of any game, since specific scenes/levels are always slower for faster. The idea is to show the relative performance of the laptops. If memory serves, the built-in performance test usually provided higher numbers than regular gameplay by 10-20%.
  • bob4432 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    did you have to unlock anything? the reason i ask is because when i run the benchmark test i get 63fps avg from an x1800xt to a 4850 to a 8800gtx to a 9800gtx @ 1280x1024 - 1680x105....rigs have 2-3GB of ram and are running from x2 4200s to e2160@3Ghz to a quad rig
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    You need to add the -novsync option to the command line argument.
  • bob4432 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    command line?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    You'll need to manually create a shortcut to the game executable (RelicCOH.exe). Then right-click on the shortcut and choose properties. In the Shortcut tab, under target, add -novsync at the end of the line (after any quotes or other stuff). The 1.70 patch enabled VSYNC by default to provide a higher quality rendering experience, and the Readme file details the above command-line parameter.
  • bob4432 - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link

    thanks for the info - ended up w/ 106fps avg w/ a decent o/c'd 4850, e2160@3GHz and 3GB ddr2-667, so i am happy w/ that. pretty impressed w/ that 7811fx machine. thinking of myself moving up to a 24" 1920x1200 lcd here in a couple days and figure that my next rig will be crossfire since i will probably need it but not too shabby for the price i paid for this current gpu. only thing is the damn heat output :)

    again, thanks

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now