Mobile Roundup: A Trio of Midrange Laptops
by Jarred Walton on September 17, 2008 3:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
AVADirect IFL90 - Features and Specifications
| AVADirect Compal IFL90 Specifications | |
| Processor | Core 2 Duo T9300 (2.50GHz 6MB 800FSB) |
| Chipset | Intel PM965 + ICH8-ME |
| Memory | 2x1024MB DDR2-667 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT 512MB |
| Display | 15.4" WSXGA+ (1680x1050) Glossy Chi Mei Optoelectronics N154Z1-L02 |
| Hard Drive | 200GB 7200RPM 8MB Seagate Momentus 7200.2 ST9200420AS |
| Optical Drive | 8x DVDR SuperMulti (Optiarc AD-7530A) |
| Networking | Integrated Gigabit Ethernet Intel 4965AGN WiFi Bluetooth v2.0 V.92 56K Modem |
| Audio | 2-Channel HD Audio (2.0 Speakers) |
| Battery | 9-Cell 80Whr |
| Front Side | WiFi On/Off Switch |
| Left Side | VGA Ethernet 56K Modem TV-Out (S-VIDEO/Composite/Component) 2 x USB 2.0 Mini FireWire ExpressCard/54 4-in-1 Flash Reader (MS, MS Pro, MMC, SD) Headphone and Mic jacks |
| Right Side | 2 x USB 2.0 Optical Drive (DVDRW) Power Connector |
| Back Side | Kensington Lock Cooling Exhaust |
| Operating System | Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit |
| Dimensions | 14.4" x 10.6-11.4" x 1.57"-1.77" (WxDxH) |
| Weight | 6.16 lbs (6-cell battery) ~6.5 lbs as tested (9-cell battery) |
| Extras | Fingerprint scanner 2.0MP webcam |
| Warranty | 1-year standard |
| Price | Superceded by Compal HL90 for ~$1400. (Includes P8600, GeForce 9600 GT, 2x2GB RAM, 320GB HDD) |
The Compal IFL90 is a typical midrange notebook, with one specific feature that caused us to request this model for review. That feature is the LCD, which can be either a 1280x800 model or an upgraded 1680x1050 display. Tons of 15.4" notebooks ship with 1280x800 LCDs, but there aren't nearly as many with 1680x1050 displays so we were interested to see how this one compares to other laptops. We'll cut through the suspense by saying that if you want a higher resolution notebook display, the 1080P option on the Acer 6920G ends up being a better overall solution right now. Still, the 1680x1050 display is a lot better than most of the 1280x800 LCDs we've tested - and not just in terms of having a higher resolution.
Compal offers two different battery sizes for the IFL90/HL90. We received the higher capacity 9-cell battery, which should provide 35% to 50% more battery life than the 6-cell option. (There are two different 6-cell batteries, which is why it's not necessarily a 50% improvement.) Increased battery life is certainly nice to have, but the high-capacity battery has a similar problem to the battery on the Gateway P-series notebooks: it extends an extra inch beyond the back of the laptop. Since we are not dealing with a mammoth 17" chassis, we didn't find this to be as much of a problem as on the Gateway notebook, but it does make for a somewhat less desirable form factor.
As mentioned already, the IFL90 that we are testing is no longer stocked by AVADirect, since it was replaced by the HL90. Looking at options on the HL90, you have a choice of two LCD resolutions, 16 CPUs, 33 different RAM configurations, 52 different hard drives/SSDs, two optical drives (DVDR or Blu-ray recorder), 16 different operating systems (including no operating system), and various other items like networking, Bluetooth, and accessories. This can definitely be overwhelming for uninformed users, but for technophiles this is about as good as shopping for parts at Newegg. One option we wish they would offer is a BD-ROM/DVDR in place of the Blu-ray recorder, as we don't see ourselves recording Blu-ray movies and you should be able to save about $250 while maintaining Blu-ray playback capability (not that Blu-ray support is likely to be any better than on the other laptops we've tested).
The system we received for review initially retailed for around $1500; now an upgraded HL90 system with a P8600, 4GB of memory, and Vista Home Premium 64-bit will run about $1400. According to our testing and information from Compal, we also expect the HL90 with a Core 2 Duo P-series processor should provide 25 to 30% more battery life. Ain't progress grand?
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
26 Comments
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link
Not that it really matters since they're all pretty slow, but the HD 3470 is about half the performance of the HD 2600 and 8600M GS. Like I said in the review, though, if you really care about graphics performance you'll want a lot more than even the 8600M/HD 2600 (or 9600M/HD 3600).Personally, the minimum configuration I'd go with on the T400 ends up at around $1350 - because the 80GB default HDD is way too small for me. I personally think the Thinkpad laptops work well but look pretty dull, but build quality has always been good on the systems I've seen/used. I'd love to get one for testing (and in particular I'd like to test the LCD - I've heard some models even have S-IPS panels, but maybe that was only on some of their previous laptops when they were still IBM), but so far no luck there.
Voldenuit - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link
The T60p had an S-IPS panel, as did several other earlier models. The current crop of T400/500/W500 use TN-Film. Notebookreview compared the screen on the T400 favourably against the S-IPS on the T60:http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4...">http://www.notebookreview.com/default.a...D=4569&a...
Bottom line, you shouldn't be doing colour-calibration sensitive work on a laptop in the field anyway, and if you're doing it indoors, you'd probably want an external display for the added resolution if nothing else.
strikeback03 - Friday, September 19, 2008 - link
That review clearly shows that the TN screens still have along way to go to match the S-IPS in anything other than brightness.And if you had a decent display on a laptop, why not use it for color-sensitive work? Lenovo is guessing people will with the new W700.
Voldenuit - Saturday, September 20, 2008 - link
Because a typical laptop in the field will be subjected to various (changing) lighting conditions, so any colour calibration on the lcd will be moot. That and most laptop displays don't even give you the option to mess with the ICC profiles.The W700 is not exactly "portable", so it is likely to stay anchored in an office.
The sad practical reality though is that practically no one is making S-IPS screens for laptops anymore (see the lenovo blogs on this issue), so we're stuck with TN-film until the market responds with a demand for higher quality panels.
Loknar - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link
Acer will have to do a lot to win me over. My company bought hundreds and now they are piling up in the corner, defect just after warranty expired. The Acers I'm talking about are centrinos and recent core duos. The construction is terrible. Those currently in use by my staff crashes (from overheating) when programmers are compiling applications. When you shake them it feels like old plastic of 1980's Toyotas, and often there are loose bolts inside.My company gave me are core2duo and I use it at home, removed the bottom casing and installed a cooling pad. It still crashes sometimes when my girlfriend plays tetris.
The battery life and LCD display may seem ok in this lineup. But it is still unacceptable for me, give me a lower spec MacBook anytime. I had to get as far away as Acer as possible and got a MacBookPro, but a simple MacBook would have satisfied my office needs.
Foxy1 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link
Did anyone happen to catch the score of the OU/Washington game?JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link
No, but I did go see the BYU/Washington game in person. It was awesome watching the Cougars pull off the win at the end. Despite all the complaints from WA fans, it's worth noting that they had something like three penalties the whole game, they didn't get called for the blatant holds on 4th and 10 during the final drive, and the refs also didn't call the illegal forward pass with one minute remaining where the QB was a yard over the line of scrimmage. After such a demoralizing loss, it's hardly a surprise that they rolled over and played dead for OU.Go Cougars!
Donkey2008 - Friday, September 19, 2008 - link
There was no excuse for the unsportsmanlike penalty. BYU fans can point a finger at other calls (which apparantly only they saw) leading up to the touchdown, but the referee influenced the outcome of the game. End of story. UW should have been kicking an EP, not a 35-yard FG.The more BYU fans try to deflect that fact, the worse it makes the call look. Just say "hey, it was a bad call. We got lucky" and the whole incident will be over.
JarredWalton - Friday, September 19, 2008 - link
Okay, TOTALLY 100% OFF TOPIC:If you throw a ball 25 feet into the air after a TD, that's a penalty. The only people who think it was a "bad call" are WA fans or people that don't like BYU. If you think it's a "bad rule" that should be changed, fine, but that's a different debate.
I just loved Lou Holtz' commentary on ESPN: "He didn't throw the ball; he just raised his hands and the ball happened to be in them." LOL... That's as insightful as his repeated analysis of how great the Notre Dame team is always going to be.
Think I'm making this stuff up? How about a little physics to back things up?
http://www.truveo.com/Endzone-View-of-Locker-Throw...">hang time = 2.36 s - nope, he didn't just "toss it over his shoulder" (unless it mysteriously disappeared for 2.36 seconds)
The ball is stopped at the apex, which is half the time, so:
velocity final = vf = 0 m/s
time = t = 1.18 s
acceleration = a = -9.8 m/s2
Solve for distance (height) = d = ??
First use: vf = vi + a*t
vi = velocity initial
0 m/s = vi + (-9.8 m/s2)*(1.18 s)
0 m/s = vi - 11.564 m/s
vi = 11.564 m/s
Now use: vf^2 = vi^2 + 2*a*d
(0 m/s)^2 = (11.564 m/s)^2 + 2*(-9.8 m/s^2)*(d)
0 m^2/s^2 = (133.726096 m^2/s^2) + (-19.6 m/s^2)*d
-133.726096 m^2/s^2 = (-19.6 m/s^2)*d
(-133.726096 m^2/s^2)/(-19.6 m/s^2) = d
d = 6.82276 m
Don't know about you guys, but lofting a football 22.3843 feet into the air seems pretty "high" to me. That's the equivalent of throwing a football (at a 30 degree angle) around 25 yards - perhaps not the hardest he could throw it, but certainly not an "accident" or "toss".
Is the rule bad? Perhaps. If so, it's up to the schools to make the change, not the refs. If you want to blame someone other than Locker, don't blame the officials; blame PAC-10 and the other conferences that told the officials to clamp down on post-TD celebrations.
To reiterate: I was *at* the game. How many penalties went against WA? Three, two of which came on the final drive. (Okay, four if you count the offsides call on the final kickoff after their blocked PAT.) How many against BYU? Seven. This wasn't a dirty game, but WA didn't have a single false start or offsides called against them (there are always a couple), not a single hold (again, there are always a few of those), and yet they're going to blame the refs!?
Here's another completely blown call for you: one minute remaining, ball is on BYU's 41 yard line. Locker completes a pass to the 29 yard line for a first down... except he threw the ball from the 39 yard line (two *YARDS* over the line of scrimmage)!
Okay, that's the last I'm saying about this in the comments of a laptop review. Who in the heck brought up a football discussion anyway? Someone needs to get their priorities straight....
[END OFF TOPIC DISCUSSION]
bob4432 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link
how did you bench company of heroes? fraps? the built in test? some custom test?