Dell XPS M1710 - GeForce Go 7900 GTX 512 Mobile Gaming, Part 1
by Jarred Walton on April 18, 2006 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
General System Performance
Winstones 2004 and the PCMark products provide a reasonable look at overall system performance (minus games). Honestly, any modern dual core system is basically "fast enough" when it comes to these tasks. Anyone looking to buy an XPS system would have to be interested in gaming, or at least some more graphics intensive applications, or else they would be far better off ditching the high-powered graphics chip. Still, let's see how the systems compare.
The M1710 delivers an impressive start, basically winning five of the six tests. The only benchmark that it doesn't win is Business Winstones, where it finishes last place. That particular test has very little that will take advantage of multiple processors, and of all the tests we'll run today, it represents applications that are most dependent on user input. PCMark05 has the M1710 in the middle of the pack, but the faster graphics cards of the desktop systems are the only thing keeping it from a first-place finish.
Winstones 2004 and the PCMark products provide a reasonable look at overall system performance (minus games). Honestly, any modern dual core system is basically "fast enough" when it comes to these tasks. Anyone looking to buy an XPS system would have to be interested in gaming, or at least some more graphics intensive applications, or else they would be far better off ditching the high-powered graphics chip. Still, let's see how the systems compare.
The M1710 delivers an impressive start, basically winning five of the six tests. The only benchmark that it doesn't win is Business Winstones, where it finishes last place. That particular test has very little that will take advantage of multiple processors, and of all the tests we'll run today, it represents applications that are most dependent on user input. PCMark05 has the M1710 in the middle of the pack, but the faster graphics cards of the desktop systems are the only thing keeping it from a first-place finish.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
69 Comments
View All Comments
rqle - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link
i rather take 2 Dell 17inch w/ 7900GT then one 15.4 apple w/ 1600xt.Or rather take 2 non XPS w/7900GT then one with 7900GTX
Quiksel - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link
what are you smoking? The 17" PBG4 is only 6.9 lbs.http://www.apple.com/powerbook/specs.html">Specs for the 17" PowerBook
8.8lbs. is crazy heavy. Nice performance, but DAMN, that's heavy.
NullSubroutine - Wednesday, April 19, 2006 - link
i have an E1705 which is a xps without the cool lights and currently has 7800 go, instead of 7900 go gtx (but i will be purchasing). i believe mine weighs like 7 or 8 lbs, and i take it with me to class, unless its just because im buff guy, 8lbs isnt that heavy.ProviaFan - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link
...but I'm not going to use this in favor of my Athlon X2 4400+ workstation with 4GB of RAM, multiple hard disks, and a 21" Samsung LCD. While it would be "good enough" for most photo editing (certainly has enough CPU), and it would totally kick ass for LAN parties, it doesn't dethrone the workstation plus smaller laptop that is actually portable setup for people who need more expansion flexibility with some portability as well.Trisped - Friday, April 21, 2006 - link
So you would spend your $1000 mobility tax on a laptop and use the rest of the money to buy a desktop. That makes sense. The only disadvantage is if you need mobile power, but I think that would be rare. So you would spend your $1000 mobility tax on a laptop and use the rest of the money to buy a desktop. The only disadvantage is if you need mobile power, but I think that would be rare.Trisped - Friday, April 21, 2006 - link
Sorry about the double print, just follow the second lineKeypoX - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link
can i have onePeteRoy - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link
I want one too.JarredWalton - Tuesday, April 18, 2006 - link
And I don't want to send this one back! :( LOL