AMD Opteron 248 vs. Intel Xeon 2.8: 2-way Web Servers go Head to Head
by Anand Lal Shimpi & Jason Clark on December 17, 2003 9:15 AM EST- Posted in
- IT Computing
Let’s Not Forget Intel
Intel also has made some new CPUs available since the last time we dusted off our Xeon test beds. The Xeon MP is now available in 1MB and 2MB L3 cache sizes at speeds of up to 2.8GHz.
The 2MB L3 version of the Xeon MP was actually the basis for the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition that was launched just a week before AMD released the Athlon 64 FX.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
43 Comments
View All Comments
Pandaren - Wednesday, December 17, 2003 - link
cramitpal, speaking as an advocate of the k8 architecture, I have to say that you are acting like an asshat. cut the holy jihad crap and jerry falwell flaming - frankly you sound like a Steve Jobs worshiper or a Linux-happy script kiddie.k8 is a nice architecture for servers. it has been clear to me for some time that intel designed netburst for multimedia applications, and this emphasis has hurt netburst Xeons ever since the days of the Willamette (anyone remember the Willamette based Xeons getting matched or beaten by Pentium III based Xeons?)
PaperclipGod - Wednesday, December 17, 2003 - link
I really enjoyed this article. Very well written. Looking forward to the Itanium 2 comparison.CRAMITPAL - Wednesday, December 17, 2003 - link
What a humbling experience for Intel... Results mirror other website tests of the latest and greatest Xeon w/L3 cache. AMD just HAMMERS Intel's Xeon into the ground.You would think Intel would be anxious to provide a 2P Itanic for comparison, wouldn't you??? Do you think Intel is afraid enterprise will realize that Opteron can provide Itanic 64-bit performance, and superior 32-bit performance for tens of thousands less??? The clowns in Satan Clara must STILL think the World is full of sheep! This review should make the Intel fanboys go POSTAL again.
SOS same dumbass Intel fanboys. Maybe these confused fanboys are actually Intel SpinMeisters looking to keep their jobs as Intel's sales and market share diminish???